Archontic Deception Strategy: Difference between revisions
Content |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Archontic Deception Strategy'' is a concept coined by the Energetic Synthesis body of work describing a wide array of deliberate strategies, actions and deceptions perpetuated by human and non-human intelligence such as the ''Negative Alien Archon group (the NAA) and select group of bloodlines'' ruling the world from the shadows of secrecy. The interesting point to note is that the usage of this term currently is designated to the ''new age speak'' and ''conspiracy theories.'' | |||
For clarity purposes I would like to remind the readers that the usage of the term ''conspiracy theory / theorist'' in the modern context was coined by Austrian philosopher Karl Popper (1902-1994) who used the term ''"conspiracy theory of society"'' in his work ''The Open Society and Its Enemies'' (1945) to show the fallacy of explaining all major events as a result of deliberate and meticulous plot by powerful groups. It was him who framed this term as irrational and anti-scientific in connection with independent, diversified, and discerning thinking style. By the 1950s–60s the phrase had become a standard dismissive label. | |||
Revision as of 18:45, 16 October 2026
Archontic Deception Strategy is a concept coined by the Energetic Synthesis body of work describing a wide array of deliberate strategies, actions and deceptions perpetuated by human and non-human intelligence such as the Negative Alien Archon group (the NAA) and select group of bloodlines ruling the world from the shadows of secrecy. The interesting point to note is that the usage of this term currently is designated to the new age speak and conspiracy theories.
For clarity purposes I would like to remind the readers that the usage of the term conspiracy theory / theorist in the modern context was coined by Austrian philosopher Karl Popper (1902-1994) who used the term "conspiracy theory of society" in his work The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945) to show the fallacy of explaining all major events as a result of deliberate and meticulous plot by powerful groups. It was him who framed this term as irrational and anti-scientific in connection with independent, diversified, and discerning thinking style. By the 1950s–60s the phrase had become a standard dismissive label.